Talk:Deadline Scheduler

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

Linux Low‑importance

	Linux portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linux, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Linux on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinuxWikipedia:WikiProject LinuxTemplate:WikiProject LinuxLinux articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

For Which disk?

It is unclear where we can benefit from the deadline scheduler. I'm running my Ubuntu from a flashdisk (USB) and would like to know if this scheduling is an improvement on a USB disk (which has low read latency, but extremely high write and random R/W latency). It would be cool to mention if this sceduler is aimed for RAID, HD, SSD, SD or USB Flash or ....

Explanation of front_merges

This chapter uses "current batch" vs "active batch" without explaining what this means or what the difference is. Also, why wouldn't all batches be checked whether a request could be merged into it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.146.191.154 (talk) 10:21, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation?

There is a piece of commercial software called Deadline (thinkboxsoftware.com) that is a render farm queue manager. Since both of these involve "scheduling" it might be helpful to provide some disambiguation. I'm not certain of the best way to approach that, but I figured I can at least bring it up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mmmancact (talk • contribs) 15:28, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Article too Linux specific

"Deadline scheduling" is a concept which has been around for decades – this Linux kernel component is just one implementation of it. We have an article discussing one particular theoretical version of it – Deadline-monotonic scheduling. But we have no coverage of other historically significant implementations, for example IBM mainframes, in particular JES3's implementation of deadline scheduling. I think either this article should be renamed to Deadline scheduler (Linux), or expanded to cover other historical instances. SomethingForDeletion (talk) 23:22, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Article shouldn't really read like documentation

The article seems to read more like software documentation than a description Mnem42 (talk) 12:38, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]